#607 closed defect (worksforme)
many widget options are not integrated to gui
| Reported by: | Bluestone | Owned by: | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Priority: | minor | Milestone: | |
| Component: | BAR | Version: | |
| Keywords: | Cc: |
Description (last modified by )
at some point we need to decide which widgets settings are important enough to get a space in the option menu
Change History (4)
comment:4 by , 9 years ago
| Description: | modified (diff) |
|---|---|
| Summary: | ally cursors options are not integrated to gui → many widget options are not integrated to gui |
comment:5 by , 9 years ago
comment:6 by , 9 years ago
Yes - I saw it and it looks really good. The hard part of this ticket is deciding what options deserve space and which don't! No need to do anything for now.
comment:7 by , 8 years ago
| Resolution: | → worksforme |
|---|---|
| Status: | new → closed |
Used the API for the first time today and its great, will add appropriate options gradually as I work my way through the widgets/gadgets.
Didn't yet look at the performance of the shaders (except for the unit shader, which is all fine) but thats definitely smth that someone will need to do.
Note:
See TracTickets
for help on using tickets.
At the moment I've slowly been putting some work into somewhat of an API for the option menu. I'd like to make it pretty simple to add options and for future maintenance etc..
Once I get a little further with that it should be a pretty straight forward process.
I think my first priority will be any performance affecting options such as is in Bloom/LOS.